Skip to content.
Navigation

Navigation
  Auburn Rancheria

Clover Valley fight still on

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Despite a downsized plan for building homes, foes say they want to save the site.

By Dan Nguyen -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 am PST

A downsized plan may ease some of the resistance for the controversial Clover Valley Lakes development project, but the group opposed to building in the valley said it plans to continue fighting. Clover Valley is a pristine 622 acres of open land covered by a canopy of 28,000 oaks and home to 33 American Indian artifact sites.

Developer Clover Valley Partners hopes to have its new plan - reducing the number of homes planned for the site by 40 percent - in front of the City Council for ap-proval by the summer.

Allison Miller, chairwoman of the Save Clover Valley Foundation, said that given the resistance to the project in the past - it was initially proposed nearly a decade ago - that timeline is far too optimistic.

The group has opposed the general plan for the valley, saying that even a reduced number of lots, plus a proposed throughway connecting Park Drive to Sierra College Boulevard, would ruin Clover Valley's scenic and historical character. At a Wednesday breakfast hosted by the Rocklin Area Chamber of Commerce, former Roseville city manager Al Johnson presented the new plan. It was a presentation he has made more than a dozen times as a consultant on behalf of Clover Valley Partners. Johnson said the development now only contains 558 homes, not the 952 proposed previously. Instead of 66 acres of public open space, there are now 366 acres. Since the builders are required to plant 15 to 20 trees per lot, the valley would end up with more trees than before.

"We're trying to preserve as much as we can," he told the 60 breakfast attendees.

Miller of Save Clover Valley attended the breakfast to voice opposition to the project.

She complimented the developer's efforts to retain the valley's character but said she still hoped the entire valley could be saved.

"There's a lot of places to build homes, why (Clover Valley)?" Miller asked.

The bottom line, Johnson responded, was that the developer had the right to build the homes.

"There's an obligation by the city to do a project as long as it is consistent with the general plan," he said.

Councilman Brett Storey said in a phone interview that the city is legally bound to allow landowners to develop their property. He added, though, that the council is interested in preventing overdevelopment in the city.

"Believe me, we are going to make the developer go through the process and make them understand the citizens' concerns," he said.

Storey said the number of homes in the latest plan was a "much more appropriate density."

The downsizing of the project was made possible by the current real estate market, Johnson said. The lots are priced to sell for at least $1 million each.

He said there was still a possibility of someone else buying the land, which is estimated to be worth from $50 million to $90 million.

That possibility arose last spring when the United Auburn Indian Community, which considers the valley to be part of its heritage, funded a $40,000 Save Clover Valley public relations campaign.

The tribe, which owns Thunder Valley Casino, also expressed interest in purchasing Clover Valley in its entirety.

But the developer's willingness to compromise has reduced the chance that the tribe would buy Clover Valley outright, said Howard Dickstein, the tribe's attorney.

Dickstein said the tribe is "pleased that the project has been significantly downsized."

He said negotiations between the tribe and developer are still ongoing, but the tribe's main concern was in protecting the cultural sites.

"The tribe is particularly interested in purchasing the burial and artifact sites," Dickstein said. "That is foremost in the tribe's mind, and progress is being made on that forefront."

Miller said she is aware of the negotiations but doesn't think they mean the end of the effort to save the entire valley. The group's current focus, Miller said, is to continue raising awareness of the valley and its proposed development. She contended that only one in five Rocklin residents knows of the valley's existence and that the developers would have more opposition once more people see the valley.

"(Clover Valley) is incredible; it's like a step back in time," she said.

Historic Photos
Contact Us Links of Interest Photo Gallery News & Media Programs About Us Home Contact Us History News Updates Photo One Photo Two Photo Three Photo Four Photo Five